2004 Noble M12 vs. 1972 Rover 2000
To start off, 2004 Noble M12 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Noble M12 (335 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1972 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 2000 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2004 Noble M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Noble M12 (486 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Noble M12 | 1972 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Noble | Rover |
Model | M12 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 486 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |