2004 Noble M14 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2004 Noble M14 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Noble M14 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Noble M14 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2004 Noble M14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Noble M14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Noble M14 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Noble | Proton |
Model | M14 | 300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2450 mm |