2004 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 1946 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (170 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 530 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Peugeot 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Peugeot 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Oldsmobile Alero | 1946 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Peugeot |
Model | Alero | 202 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3343 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 30 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2460 mm |