2004 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 144 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.
Because 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Alero | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1338 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2760 mm |
