2004 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (140 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 208 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (203 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Oldsmobile Alero | 1983 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Alero | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1338 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |