2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette vs. 2012 Audi A3

To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette weights approximately 331 kg more than 2012 Audi A3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette (285 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette 2012 Audi A3
Make Oldsmobile Audi
Model Silhouette A3
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 200 HP
Torque 285 Nm 280 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1791 kg 1460 kg
Vehicle Length 5120 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1763 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2578 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.8 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 55 L