2004 Opel Combo vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Combo would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Opel Combo. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Combo.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Combo. (139 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Opel Combo | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Opel | Citroen |
Model | Combo | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |