2004 Opel Omega vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2004 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 315 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Opel Omega | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Opel | Pontiac |
Model | Omega | Tempest |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 5341 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2930 mm |