2004 Opel Omega vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 650 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Opel Omega (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Opel Omega | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Opel | Volvo |
| Model | Omega | 220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |
