2004 Opel Omega vs. 2002 Tata E
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Tata E would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Tata E should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 Tata E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Omega. (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Opel Omega | 2002 Tata E | |
Make | Opel | Tata |
Model | Omega | E |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2810 mm |