2004 Opel Omega vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Opel Omega. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Omega.
Because 2004 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Opel Omega | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Opel | Peugeot |
| Model | Omega | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1359 mm |
