2004 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Opel Omega. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Omega.
Because 2004 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Opel Omega | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Opel | Peugeot |
Model | Omega | RCZ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1359 mm |