2004 Opel Signum vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Signum. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Signum would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Signum is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Opel Signum (173 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Opel Signum should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Opel Signum | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Opel | Nissan |
Model | Signum | Pixo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2360 mm |