2004 Pagani Zonda vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 322 more horse power than 2000 Ford Falcon. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 268 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2004 Pagani Zonda has manual transmission. 2004 Pagani Zonda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Pagani Zonda | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Pagani | Ford |
Model | Zonda | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 542 HP | 220 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4395 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2055 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1151 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2800 mm |