2004 Pagani Zonda vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2004 Pagani Zonda. (542 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2004 Pagani Zonda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 665 kg more than 2004 Pagani Zonda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Pagani Zonda | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Pagani | Cadillac |
| Model | Zonda | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4395 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2055 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1151 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |
