2004 Panoz AIV vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Panoz AIV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Panoz AIV weights approximately 245 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Panoz AIV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Panoz AIV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Panoz AIV | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Panoz | Renault |
| Model | AIV | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |
