2004 Panoz Esperante vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Panoz Esperante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Panoz Esperante would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Panoz Esperante (305 HP) has 144 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 508. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 508.
Because 2004 Panoz Esperante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Panoz Esperante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Panoz Esperante | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Panoz | Peugeot |
Model | Esperante | 508 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |