2004 Peugeot 605 vs. 2012 BMW 530

To start off, 2012 BMW 530 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 605. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 605 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 530 (271 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2004 Peugeot 605. (208 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2004 Peugeot 605. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 530 weights approximately 830 kg more than 2004 Peugeot 605. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 530 (310 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Peugeot 605. (205 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Peugeot 605.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Peugeot 605 2012 BMW 530
Make Peugeot BMW
Model 605 530
Year Released 2004 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2946 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 271 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 205 Nm 310 Nm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 880 kg 1710 kg
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2968 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]