2004 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 4,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun. (163 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 179 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Pontiac Bonneville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Bonneville (407 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun. (373 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Pontiac Bonneville | 2010 Mitsubishi Shogun | |
Make | Pontiac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Bonneville | Shogun |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4556 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1719 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 88 L |