2004 Pontiac GTO vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Pontiac GTO is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,669 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 455 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Pontiac GTO | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Pontiac | Riley |
| Model | GTO | RM A |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 5669 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2870 mm |
