2004 Pontiac GTO vs. 1999 Tata E220
To start off, 2004 Pontiac GTO is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Tata E220 would be higher. At 5,669 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac GTO (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1999 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1999 Tata E220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 316 kg more than 1999 Tata E220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac GTO (495 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Tata E220. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Tata E220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Pontiac GTO | 1999 Tata E220 | |
Make | Pontiac | Tata |
Model | GTO | E220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5669 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2810 mm |