2004 Pontiac Montana vs. 1972 Rover P5B

To start off, 2004 Pontiac Montana is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pontiac Montana (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1972 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 208 kg more than 1972 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Pontiac Montana (298 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover P5B. (295 Nm). This means 2004 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover P5B.

Compare all specifications: