2004 Pontiac Montana vs. 2009 BMW 130

To start off, 2009 BMW 130 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2004 Pontiac Montana. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 2004 Pontiac Montana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 560 kg more than 2009 BMW 130.

Because 2004 Pontiac Montana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 130. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 130 (316 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Pontiac Montana. (298 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Pontiac Montana.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Pontiac Montana 2009 BMW 130
Make Pontiac BMW
Model Montana 130
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3392 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 316 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 88 mm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2010 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 5120 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 8.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 53 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]