2004 Proton 300 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2004 Proton 300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton 300. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Proton 300 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Proton | Rover |
Model | 300 | 400 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |