2004 Proton 400 vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 2004 Proton 400 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 216 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 216 (122 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 216 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Rover 216 (140 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton 400. (109 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Rover 216 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Proton 400 | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Proton | Rover |
Model | 400 | 216 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |