2004 Proton 400 vs. 1995 Rover 414i
To start off, 2004 Proton 400 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 414i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 414i (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 414i should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 414i weights approximately 176 kg more than 2004 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 414i (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Proton 400 | 1995 Rover 414i | |
Make | Proton | Rover |
Model | 400 | 414i |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1146 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2630 mm |