2004 Proton Gen-2 vs. 1963 Rover P5
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover P5 (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Proton Gen-2 | 1963 Rover P5 | |
Make | Proton | Rover |
Model | Gen-2 | P5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2820 mm |