2004 Proton Gen-2 vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Proton Gen-2 | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Proton | Volvo |
| Model | Gen-2 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2860 mm |
