2004 Proton Gen-2 vs. 2010 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Defender is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 2,402 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Defender (120 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Defender should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Defender (360 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Proton Gen-2 | 2010 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Proton | Land Rover |
Model | Gen-2 | Defender |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2402 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2800 mm |