2004 Proton Gen-2 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Proton Gen-2 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Proton | Renault |
| Model | Gen-2 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2580 mm |
