2004 Renault Clio vs. 1944 Simca 5
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,459 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1944 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 471 kg more than 1944 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1944 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Clio | 1944 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Renault | Simca |
| Model | Clio | 5 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1944 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 1459 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 564 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
