2004 Renault Clio vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 256 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Clio | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Renault | Seat |
| Model | Clio | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |
