2004 Renault Clio vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 736 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Clio | 1965 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | Clio | 8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 955 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 38 L |
