2004 Renault Clio vs. 1984 Holden Camira

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Holden Camira (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Holden Camira weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira. 1984 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: