2004 Renault Clio vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Suzuki XL6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Suzuki XL6 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (98 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Clio | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Clio | XL6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2490 mm |
