2004 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2005 Samsung SM3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Samsung SM3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (98 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 109 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Samsung SM3 (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Samsung SM3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Clio | 2005 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Renault | Samsung |
Model | Clio | SM3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2540 mm |