2004 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Clio | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Clio | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |