2004 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (191 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Clio | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Clio | Colorado |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Size | 1459 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |