2004 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2009 Lancia Musa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,459 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lancia Musa (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lancia Musa should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lancia Musa weights approximately 243 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lancia Musa (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Lancia Musa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio. 2009 Lancia Musa has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Lancia Musa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Clio | 2009 Lancia Musa | |
Make | Renault | Lancia |
Model | Clio | Musa |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Size | 1459 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 173 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1278 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.3 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 47 L |