2004 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saturn Outlook weights approximately 324 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Clio | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Renault | Saturn |
Model | Clio | Outlook |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |