2004 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Clio | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | Clio | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Size | 1459 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4681 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1659 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |
