2004 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Doblo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Doblo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Doblo (102 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Doblo should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Fiat Doblo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Clio | 2012 Fiat Doblo | |
| Make | Renault | Fiat |
| Model | Clio | Doblo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Panel Van |
| Engine Size | 1459 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2570 mm |
