2004 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic (133 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Grand Scenic | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Grand Scenic | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |
