2004 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (161 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 1405 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Grand Scenic | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Renault | Westfield |
Model | Grand Scenic | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |