2004 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 337 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (200 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Renault Grand Scenic 2010 Mazda 3
Make Renault Mazda
Model Grand Scenic 3
Year Released 2004 2010
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 133 HP 167 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 200 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1700 kg 1363 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4506 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 60 L