2004 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic (161 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2012 Smart ForTwo. (71 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 2012 Smart ForTwo.

Because 2012 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Smart ForTwo (125 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. 2012 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Grand Scenic has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: