2004 Renault Kangoo vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Renault Kangoo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Kangoo (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Kangoo (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Kangoo | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Kangoo | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |