2004 Renault Kangoo vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2004 Renault Kangoo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Kangoo.
Because 2004 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Kangoo. (188 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Kangoo. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Kangoo has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Kangoo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Kangoo | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Kangoo | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |