2004 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Optima (274 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2004 Renault Megane. (96 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Optima (364 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Megane. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Renault Megane | 2012 Kia Optima | |
Make | Renault | Kia |
Model | Megane | Optima |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1461 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 274 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 364 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |