2004 Renault Scenic vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 469 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Renault Scenic | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | Scenic | RM A |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1235 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |
